|
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Biological insecticide
|
|
|
|
Bacterium:
Pseudomonadales:
Pseudomonadaceae NOMENCLATURE:
Approved name: Pseudomonos
fluorescens
(Trevisan) Migula. SOURCE:
A naturally and
widely occurring bacterium. A strain that was naturally non-ice nucleating
was originally isolated and registered in the USA for suppression of frost
damage to fruit crops. Other strains with anti-fungal or anti-bacterial
activity have been isolated and commercialized in the USA and India PRODUCTION:
Produced by
fermentation. TARGET PESTS:
Soil-borne diseases
caused by Fusarium
and
Rhizoctonia spp.. TARGET CROPS:
Fruit tree crops,
particularly pears and apples, cotton and vegetables. BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY:
Mode of action:
Bacteria and
fungal propagules on the leaves of crops often serve as nucleation
sites for ice formation and ice crystals often form when they are present
and the temperature falls below freezing, with resulting damage to the leaf.
If these are replaced on plant leaves with competitive antagonists that lack
the ice-nucleating protein, frost is prevented, even at temperatures as low
as -5 °C. Other strains of Pseudomonos
fluorescens are antagonistic to foliar or
rhizosphere bacteria and fungi through the production of siderophores and
antibiotics. COMMERCIALISATION: Formulation:
Sold as seed
treatments or WPs of bacterial spores. APPLICATION:
Soil-borne pathogens
are controlled with the use of seed treatments or hopper-box applications
and foliar pathogens by spray applications. Fire blight sprays should be
applied before flowering. Apply non-nucleating bacteria to foliage of tree
crops and vegetables before the temperature falls below freezing. A single
application will protect from frost damage to temperatures as low as -5 °C
for up to two months. The bacterium must be established on the foliage
before freezing temperatures occur. PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS:
Storage conditions:
Store in a cool, dry
place in a sealed container. Do not expose to extremes of temperature or
direct sunlight. Shelf-life:
If stored under
recommended conditions, the product remains viable for a year. COMPATIBILITY:
It is unusual to
apply fluorescens
with
other chemical treatments. MAMMALIAN TOXICITY:
There are no records
of allergic or other adverse effects following use of fluorescens.
It
is regarded as being of low mammalian toxicity. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND
NON-TARGET TOXICITY: P. fluorescens.
occurs
widely in nature and is not expected to have any adverse effects on
non-target organisms. INDIAN LITERATURE: o
Anith, K.N., Manomohandas, T.P.,
Jayarajan, M., Vasanthakumar, K. and Aipe, K.C. 2000.Integration of soil
solarization and biological control with a fluorescent Pseudomonas
sp.
for
controlling bacterial wilt Ralstonia solanacearum (E. F. Smith) Yabuuchi et
al. of ginger. Journal of Biological Control. 14: (1), 25-29. o
Bhattacharya, I. and Pramanik, M. 1998.
Effect of different antagonist rhizobacteria and neem products on clubroot
of crucifers. Indian Phytopathology. 51: (1), 87-90. o
Bora, L.C., Minku, Das., Das, B.C. and
Das, M. 2000. Influence of microbial antagonists and soil amendments on
bacterial wilt severity and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon
esculentum).Indian
Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 70: (6), 390-392. o
De, R.K. and Chaudhary, R.G. 1999.
Biological and chemical seed treatment against lentil wilt. Lens Newsletter.
26: (1-2), 28-31. o
Hiremath, P.C., Kulkarni, S.A., Radder,
G.D.(ed.)., Gidnavar, V.S.(ed.)., Chittapur, B.M.(ed.)., Itnal, C.J.(ed.).,
Patil, B.N.(ed.). and Babalad, H.B. 1998. Production of biocontrol agents
for plant pathogens. Organics in sustaining soil fertility and productivity.
291-293. o
Johnson, I. and Palaniswami, A. 1999.
Phytophthora tuber rot of cassava - a new record in India. Journal of
Mycology and Plant Pathology. 29: (3), 323-332. o
Jubina, P.A. and Girija, V.K. 1998.
Antagonistic rhizobacteria for management of Phytophthora
capsici,
the incitant of foot rot of black pepper. Journal of Mycology and Plant
Pathology. 28: (2), 147-153. o
Kalaimani, T. 2000.Biological control
of red rot of sugar cane caused by (Colletotrichum falcatum
Went).
Indian Sugar. 50: (8), 489-492. o
Khan, M.R. and Khan, S.M. 2001.
Biomanagement of Fusarium wilt of tomato by the
soil application of certain phosphate solubilizing microorganisms.
International Journal of Pest Management. 47: ( 3), 227-231. o
Krishnamurthy, K. and Gnanamanickam,
S.S. 1998. Biological control of rice blast by Pseudomonas
fluorescens strain
Pf7-14: evaluation of a marker gene and formulations.Biological Control. 13:
(3), 158-165. o
Mala, S.R. and Solayappan, A.R. 2001.
Screening of certain effective microbial insecticides for the control of
sugarcane early shoot borer larvae Chilo infuscatellus Snell.Cooperative
Sugar. 32: (8), 631-633. o
Mastan, S.A. and Qureshi, T.A.
2001.Role of bacteria in the epizootic ulcerative syndrome (EUS) of fishes.
Journal of Environmental Biology. 22: (3), 187-192. o
Meena, B., Marimuthu, T., Vidhyasekaran,
P. and Velazhahan, R. 2001. Biological control of root rot of groundnut with
antagonistic Pseudomonas fluorescens strains. Zeitschrift fur
Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz. 108: (4), 369-381. o
Meena, B., Ramamoorthy, V., Marimuthu,
T. and Velazhahan, R. 2000.Pseudomonas fluorescens
mediated systemic resistance against late leaf spot of groundnut. Journal of
Mycology and Plant Pathology. 30: (2), 151-158. o
Natarajan, S., Kalaimani, T. and
Rajakumar, M. 1997. Management of sugarcane red rot disease in Tamil Nadu -
results of some trials. Indian Sugar. 47: (6), 413-418. o
Nautiyal, C.S. 1997. Selection of
chickpea-rhizosphere-competent Pseudomonas
fluorescens
NBRI1303 antagonistic to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.
ciceris, Rhizoctonia bataticola and Pythium
sp. Current Microbiology. 35: (1), 52-58. o
Parakhia, A.M., Akbari, L.F.,
Jugnu, Antharia., Vaishnav, M.U. and Antharia, J. 1998. Comparative
evaluation of bio-agents and seed dressing fungicides against Aspergillus
niger causing collar rot of groundnut. Gujarat Agricultural University
Research Journal. 23: (2), 61-65. o
Pradeep, Kumar., Sood, A.K. and Kumar,
P. 2001. Integration of antagonistic rhizobacteria and soil solarization for
the management of bacterial wilt of tomato caused by Ralstonia solanacearum.
Indian Phytopathology. 54: (1), 12-15. o
Qureshi, T.A., Mastan, S.A., Prasad,
Y., Chauhan, R., Dubey, R.K and, Chopade, R. 1999.Bacteriological
investigation on EUS affected Channa striatus (Bloch). Journal of Ecobiology.
11: (1), 71-79. o
Ramakrishnan, S., Sivakumar, C.V.,
Dhawan, S.C.(ed.). and Kaushal, K.K. 1999. Biological control of rice root
nematode with Pseudomonas fluorescens.
Proceedings of national symposium on rational approaches in nematode
management for sustainable agriculture, Anand, India, 23-25 November, 1998.
43-46. o
Ramakrishnan, S., Sivakumar,C.V.,
Poornima, K. 1998. Management of rice root nematode, Hirschmanniella
gracilis (de Man) Luc & Goodey with Pseudomonas fluorescens
Migula. Journal of Biological Control. 12: (2), 135-141. o
Ramesh, K.R. 2000. Inhibition of
Rhizoctonia solani the causal agent for collar rot of teak (Tectona grandis)
seedlings by fungicides and biocontrol agents in in-vitro conditions. Indian
Forester. 126: (3), 284-288. o
Ravi, S., Valluvaparidasan, V., Sabitha,
Doraiswamy., Jayalakshmi, C. and Doraiswamy, S. 2000.Production of Colletotrichum
lindemuthianum free French bean seeds. Legume
Research. 23: (3), 170-173. o
Santhi, A., Rajeshwari, Sundarababu.,
Sivakumar, C.V., Sundarababu, R., Dhawan, S.C.(ed.) and Kaushal, K.K. 1998.
Field evaluation of rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas
fluorescens
for the management of the citrus nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetrans.
Proceedings of national symposium on rational approaches in nematode
management for sustainable agriculture, Anand, India, 23-25 November, 1999,
38-42. o
Shaid, Ahamad., Mukesh, Srivastava.,
Ahamad, S. and Srivastana, M. 2000. Biological control of dry root rot of
chickpea with plant products and antagonistic microorganisms. Annals of
Agricultural Research. 21: (3), 450-451. o
Shanthi, A., Rajeswari, S., Sivakumar,
C.V. and Mehta, U.K. 1998. Soil application of Pseudomonas
fluorescens
(Migula) for the control of root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on
grapevine (Vitis vinifera Linn.). Nematology: challenges and opportunities
in 21st Century. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium of
Afro-Asian Society of Nematologists (TISAASN), Sugarcane Breeding Institute
(ICAR), Coimbatore, India, April 16-19, 1998. 203-206. o
Singh, U.P., Prithiviraj, B., Singh,
K.P. and Sarma, B.K. 2000. Control of powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi) of pea
(Pisum sativum) by combined application of plant growth-promoting
rhizobacteria and Neemazal TM. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und
Pflanzenschutz. 107: (1), 59-66. o
Sivakumar, G. and Narayanaswamy, N.T.
1998. Biological control of sheath blight of rice with Pseudomonas
fluorescens. Oryza. 35: (1), 57-60. o
Sivakumar, G., Sharma, R.C. and Rai,
S.N. 2000. Biocontrol of banded leaf and sheath blight of maize by peat
based Pseudomonas
fluorescens formulation. Indian Phytopathology.
53: (2), 190-192. o
Umesha, S., Dharmesh, S.M., Shetty, S.A.,
Krishnappa, M. and Shetty, H.S. 1998. Biocontrol of downy mildew disease of
pearl millet using Pseudomonas fluorescens.
Crop Protection. 17: (5), 387-392. o
Vanitha, S. 1998.Control of ragi blast
with selected fungicides and plant products. Madras Agricultural Journal.
85: (5-6), 336-337. o
Vanitha, S. and Ramachandram, K.
1999.Management of late blight disease of tomato with selected fungicides
and plant products. South Indian Horticulture. 47: (1-6), 306-307. o
Vidhyasekaran, P. and Muthamilan, M.
1999.Evaluation of a powder formulation of Pseudomonas
fluorescens
Pf1 for control of rice sheath blight. Biocontrol Scienceand Technology. 9:
(1), 67-74. |
Staff Publications Training Feedback Contact Us Search
National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, Lal Bahadur Shastri Building, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012. INDIA
Suggestions/problems contact: webmaster, Site designed and maintained by: ARIS CELL, NCIPM.